Presented by Ricardo & Wasylik, PL

If there was any doubt in your mind that banks have been forging evidence, put it to rest. According to the New York Post, an internal Wells Fargo manual has now leaked confirming the exact procedures Wells and its attorneys use to fabricate evidence in foreclosure cases—down to the computer codes they use to order production of falsified documents.

The manual itself is now spreading like wildfire, and I’ve got a copy of it here. [PDF]

The 150-plus-page document describes how Wells Fargo expects its attorneys to prepare and handle files in foreclosure cases. When Wells begins a foreclosure case, page 14 tells us what is supposed to happen:

Documents include the original note, recorded mortgage, title policy, and recorded and unrecorded assignments. Documents are sent to imaging so that at the time of referral they can be uploaded via VendorScape or Desktop to the Foreclosure Attorney.

In other words, the attorney should have a complete copy of the original note, as it exists at the time the foreclosure begins, before filing the foreclosure lawsuit. But not all cases go so smoothly. Sometimes the original note is missing. Sometimes the original note lacks an endorsement—the signature or stamp, like the signature on the back of a check, that transfers the note from one party to another. Sometimes the lawyers need to create an “allonge” to add a missing endorsement. Wells Fargo has a policy and procedure for each of these cases, and that’s where the trouble starts.

Robo-Signing Lost Note Affidavits

The real meat begins on page 15. What happens if the original note never makes it to the attorney? They communicate that fact back to Wells Fargo through the “VendorScape” or “Desktop” system—basically, a fancy kind of instant-message and tracking system between the lawyers and their supposed clients:

Attorney: If after the third business day of the referral date you have not received the note, add log code NOTRRP in VendorScape or add the Note Not Received in Referral Package Issue in Desktop. This can be done by selecting Issues from the Tool Menu and selecting Add Issue.

Wells Fargo’s document team then swings into action:

WFHM Default Docs Team: Research missing note:

• If note is found: complete the K64 step with the actual date the note was provided/sent to the Attorney. If the state does not require the original note, the document will be uploaded to LIV. Otherwise, send the note via mail and track for delivery.

• If note is not found: complete the K64 step, delete the N82 step, and add step N83, LOST NOTE AFFIDAVIT NEEDED. Only the Default Doc Team should be adding the N83 step to FOR3.

Wait: shouldn’t they know if they have the original note before they begin foreclosure proceedings? (Hush friend, that’s just a technicality.)

But again, there’s more paperwork to be done. The attorney prepares a form affidavit, and then send it to Wells Fargo for signature. And then someone at Wells Fargo just signs the affidavit:

Attorney: Once the N83 step is placed on the loan, this will authorize your office to create and forward a lost note affidavit as described in the Lost Note Affidavits (LNA) process in this manual.

WFHM Default Docs Team: Once you receive, execute, and return the LNA to the Attorney, close the N83 step.

By the way, did you catch what doesn’t happen in this loop? At After the attorney prepares the cookie-cutter affidavit using this form, Wells Fargo just signs it without making any investigation into whether the affidavit correctly states the facts of how the note was supposedly lost or what search for the note was done. In other words, more robo-signing. Haven’t we been here before?

Manufactured Endorsements

So what happens when the attorney gets the original note, but it doesn’t have an endorsement on it, the mark that legally transfers the note to the foreclosing bank? That’s when, on page 17, things really get dicey:

Note Endorsement

**Please Note** This process is only to be used if your office has already received the note. If you have not received the note, follow process for requesting the note listed in the Missing Note Process section of this manual.

That last part is important—this process can only be used when the attorneys already have the original in their custody. Remember that.

Attorney: Enter step Z02 (Endorsed Note Needed) to the FOR3 screen (if a loan is in foreclosure) or the BNK3 screen (if a loan is in Bankruptcy).

WFHM Default Docs Team: Research needed endorsement.

If the blank endorsement is in the file for an original state [a state that requires filing the original note in a foreclosure proceeding, like Florida], execute the endorsement, send the original document to the attorney, and complete the Z02 step.

So once the attorney has the original note, if it’s missing an endorsement, Wells Fargo employees “execute the endorsement” and then send it to the attorney—who already has the original note. This means that they aren’t applying the endorsement to the note itself, but to a separate document which the attorney must apparently attach to the note later. This is legally insufficient to transfer the note, and creates a huge legal problem for every Wells Fargo foreclosure in Florida and other “original document” states. (For more on why this is a problem, the ambitious reader may want to take a look at Adams v. Madison Realty & Development, Inc., 853 F.2d 163, 164 (3d Cir.1988).)

Fortunately for borrowers, Wells Fargo will completely track this sequence of events in Desktop, on the FOR2 and FOR3 screens. A skilled attorney can obtain and decipher these documents, by paying particular attention for Z02 codes.

Fabricating Allonges

Wells Fargo fabricates allonges in very nearly the same way. (What is an allonge? The Adams case explains, but so do Florida cases Booker, Isaac, and Bohatka: “An allonge is “a piece of paper annexed to a negotiable instrument or promissory note, on which to write endorsements for which there is no room on the instrument itself. Such must be so firmly affixed thereto as to become a part thereof.” Some people joke that “allonge” is simply a French word meaning “fraud.”)

Because the allonge is the piece of paper the endorsement is applied to, it has to be attached to the note at the time the endorsement is made. (Again, see Adams.) If not, it fails to transfer the note. So what happens in Wells Fargo’s world?

Attorney: If an allonge is still needed after a note has been endorsed, forward the allonge attachment to Wells Fargo Default Docs area via email address and add step Y44, ATTORNEY REQUESTED ALLONGE, to FOR3.

So what happens if the attorney needs an allonge but still has the original note? No problem! (Actually, big problem.) Wells just executes the allonge and then sends it back to the attorney who then attaches it to the note later.

WFHM Default Docs Team: If property is located in an original doc state and attorney has the original note, review the allonge attachment to determine if we have signing authority to execute internally.

• If WFHM does have signing authority, enter log code FCALGI (ALLONGE SENT FOR INTERNAL SIGNATURE)

• If WFHM does not have signing authority, enter log code FCALGE (ALLONGE SENT OUT FOR EXECUTION) and mail document for 3rd party signature.

• After allonge has been executed, enter log code FCALGA (ALLONGE COMPLETED/RETURNED TO ATTORNEY).

• Complete the Y44 actual date with the date allonge was returned to attorney.

This, simply put, means it is the policy and practice of Wells Fargo to manufacture evidence of standing. The good news for borrowers: a skilled attorney can review the FOR2 and FOR3 screens, and look at the dates of the N82 (NOTE SENT TO ATTY) and the Y44 (ALLONGE COMPLETED/RETURNED TO ATTORNEY) codes. That will tell the whole story.

What To Do If Wells Fargo Sues You

You can tell if you get sued by Wells Fargo. They will either be named as the plaintiff, or the complaint will be verified by a Wells Fargo employee. So if you get a lawsuit with Wells Fargo’s filthy fingerprints all over it, find someone who knows how to obtain and read Wells Fargo’s records—the very records that will expose the fraud. Give us a call at (888) 830-0830 or contact us online for an appointment.


Want to know more? Contact us at Ricardo & Wasylik, PL.

David Stern Disbarred, Recommends Florida Bar Referee

October 28, 2013
Thumbnail image for David Stern Disbarred, Recommends Florida Bar Referee

The case of Florida Bar v. David J. Stern just reached its next-to-last step, as the judge presiding over the hearing recommended disbarment. The report is scathing. Read it for yourself: Florida Bar v. David J. Stern: Report of Referee [PDF]

Read the full article →

Can You Cancel Your Mortgage Based on Forged Signatures?

October 9, 2013
Thumbnail image for Can You Cancel Your Mortgage Based on Forged Signatures?

You’ve got a forged signature in your mortgage documents. You’ve got them dead to rights—there’s no doubt it’s a fake. You’re excited, because you think you might have a free house. So, can you cancel your mortgage? The answer may surprise you. Who Else Wants a Free House? A lot of homeowners call us, having […]

Read the full article →

The Florida Bar v. David J Stern: No Harm, No Foul?

October 1, 2013
Thumbnail image for The Florida Bar v. David J Stern: No Harm, No Foul?

Although many people have heard of the Florida foreclosure kingpin David J. Stern, not many of those people get to see him in person.  And I, who have litigated hundreds of cases against his law firm, never saw the man before today, when I testified in the trial of the numerous bar complaints against Stern. […]

Read the full article →

The Mandate from Tallahassee: Ease Up on Banks or Crack the Whip?

September 27, 2013
Thumbnail image for The Mandate from Tallahassee: Ease Up on Banks or Crack the Whip?

The Angry Judge and the Mandate from Tallahassee We had settled the case, and the judge was furious. She stood up from her seat, looming over us from the bench, and yelled at the at me and the bank’s lawyer. We had dared to agree to postpone the foreclosure sale date so the bank would […]

Read the full article →

Is Smith, Hiatt, and Diaz (SHD Legal) about to go under?

June 6, 2013
Thumbnail image for Is Smith, Hiatt, and Diaz (SHD Legal) about to go under?

The law firm of Smith, Hiatt and Diaz has been in trouble before, but since January of this year there have been several warning signs that the firm may be in fatal trouble. I thought it was strange when, in January, the firm failed to show up for two hearings in a single week—one of […]

Read the full article →

The biggest mistake you can make in fighting your foreclosure: hiring the WRONG lawyer

May 17, 2013

Don’t hire the WRONG foreclosure defense lawyers Sometimes having the wrong lawyer is worse than having no lawyer at all. Here’s a redacted paragraph out of a recent decision by Florida Fifth District Court of Appeal about the shoddy work of one defense law firm: The quality of the legal work performed by [defense] attorneys […]

Read the full article →

David J. Stern: Florida Bar files 17-count complaint

April 18, 2013

Almost everyone knows that the Law Office of Davis J. Stern has been out of operation for more than two years now,even though the legal entity still exists (mainly for the purpose of suing its former clients for fees). But Stern himself looks like he’s about to lose his license. On April 17, the Florida […]

Read the full article →

Big Four Banks Apologize for Wreaking Economic Havoc and Promise to “Make it right.”

April 1, 2013
Thumbnail image for Big Four Banks Apologize for Wreaking Economic Havoc and Promise to “Make it right.”

NEW YORK, April 1—The leaders of the nation’s largest banks held a press conference today to apologize to the nation for the disastrous impact their greed and short-sightedness has had on the U.S. economy since the turn of the century. Bank of America, Wells Fargo, Citibank, and JP Morgan Chase all vowed that they would […]

Read the full article →

Only 15% of national mortgage fraud settlement benefits Florida homeowners

February 23, 2013

Remember when the feds and the Attorneys General of the various states announced the settlement of claims arising from the robo-signing scandal? Remember how they promised that $26 billion dollars would go to help victim of foreclosure fraud? Will you be surprised to learn it didn’t exactly happen that way? Me neither. A new report […]

Read the full article →

Pinellas Residents:
Contact Florida Senator Jack Latvala to OPPOSE foreclosure fast-track legislation

February 11, 2013
Thumbnail image for Pinellas Residents:  <br />Contact Florida Senator Jack Latvala to OPPOSE foreclosure fast-track legislation

No Senator has yet introduced a companion bill to HB 87—but rumor has it Sen. Jack Latvala will be instrumental in one when it gets drafted. Here’s the Senator’s information: Tallahassee Office: 408 Senate Office Building 404 South Monroe Street Tallahassee, FL 32399-1100 (850) 487-5020 Please contact Set. Latvala today Our sources tell us […]

Read the full article →

Florida’s foreclosure fast-track bill may expose state to billions of dollars in liability under Bert Harris Act

February 11, 2013

The Florida legislature is once again considering a bill to fast-track foreclosure cases in the judicial system—even though no one wants to use the expedited procedure that already exists—and one of the most dangerous provisions the bill contains is the so-called “Finality of judgment” section. The finality provision This finality provision is backed by well-funded […]

Read the full article →

An open letter to Florida’s lawmakers

February 6, 2013

Dear Subcommittee Members, Party Leaders, and all Legislators: Vote NO on House Bill 87. If you’ve never stepped foot in a foreclosure courtroom, vote NO HB 87, because you cannot understand what the real problem is. If you think that the speed of foreclosure is the fault of Florida’s homestead property owners, then vote NO […]

Read the full article →

The “Bring a court action” language does not substantially comply with Paragraph 22, says Broward County judge in blistering opinion

January 24, 2013

What’s the biggest battle raging on the front lines of the foreclosure wars? The failure of nearly all the banks to comply with the pre-acceleration notice requirements contained in paragraph 22 of the mortgage. The bank’s breach vs. substantial compliance On the defense side, we see that nearly every letter that goes out contains some […]

Read the full article →

Another one bites the dust: Spear and Hoffman, minor foreclosure mill, to close its doors

January 8, 2013

A day after we learned aout the impending closure of Marshall C Watson, P.A., we have now learned that Spear and Hoffman P.A., a relatively small foreclosure mill based in Miami, is also shutting its doors soon. This one seems to be financial, rather than any wrongdoing—the firm had a much smaller volume than most […]

Read the full article →

Marshall Watson to surrender law license and close law firm

January 8, 2013

Marshall C. Watson, the lawyer at the head of one of Florida’s most notorious foreclosure mills, will soon surrender his law license and shut down his infamous law firm, reports the Palm Beach Post’s Kim Miller. According to the Post: The owner of the Fort Lauderdale-based Law Offices of Marshall C. Watson has agreed to […]

Read the full article →

One little letter to save your home: Florida appellate court rejects “substantial compliance” in Judy

December 1, 2012
Thumbnail image for One little letter to save your home: Florida appellate court rejects “substantial compliance” in <em>Judy</em>

One little letter stands between you and the bank that wants to take your home, if you’re in foreclosure. Those of you following recent developments in foreclosure law know that a defense, first developed by the foreclosure lawyers at Ricardo & Wasylik, has been taking the state by storm: the defective notice letters sent by […]

Read the full article →

Florida Default Law Group, Under Investigation Again, Changes Name to Ronald R. Wolfe & Assoc.

May 28, 2012

Notorious foreclosure mill Florida Default Law Group has changed its name to Ronald R. Wolfe & Associates—possibly after a sale of the troubled firm—is under investigation again, this time for offering fake cash-for-keys deals to homeowner facing foreclosure: Christian Flint jumped at a chance to make $2,000 by leaving his rented home in Winter Springs […]

Read the full article →

The Law Office of David J. Stern Still Operating in 2012

May 27, 2012

Despite earlier reports that The Law Offices of David J. Stern has shut its doors forever, the firm still appears to be functioning. According to documents filed with Florida’s Secretary of State in early 2012, the law firm is still operating at a Brickell Avenue address with Stern’s long-time partner-in-foreclosure Forrest McSurdy taking the helm.

Read the full article →